Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878714›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Has the Introduction of PARP Inhibitors Alleviated the Global, Regional and National Burden of Ovarian Cancer? A Segmented Regression Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2007-2021.

Hua Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hua YangDepartment of Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-8104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the global, regional, and national impact of the 2014 FDA approval of PARP inhibitors on ovarian cancer burden, leveraging the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data from 2007 to 2021. Methods: We conducted a segmented regression analysis with breakpoint detection to compare trends in ovarian cancer incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and years of life lost (YLLs) before (2007-2013) and after (2015-2021) the 2014 landmark. Results: While the absolute global burden of ovarian cancer increased, significant declines in age-standardized incidence, mortality, DALYs, and YLLs were observed in high Socio-demographic Index (SDI) regions and nations. Crucially, breakpoint analysis revealed that these improving trends predominantly began around 2009, years prior to the introduction of PARP inhibitors. In stark contrast, low and middle-SDI regions experienced significant increases across all disease burden metrics. China emerged as a pivotal case, transitioning to the highest absolute death toll and demonstrating a later, unique breakpoint for age-standardized YLDs in 2014. Conclusion: The reduction in ovarian cancer burden in high-income countries was initiated in the pre-PARP inhibitor era, suggesting that earlier advancements in care were the primary drivers. The divergent trends highlight a widening global disparity, underscoring that the benefits of this targeted therapy have not yet been realized at a population level, particularly in developing regions. Our findings call for urgent policy interventions to improve global access to effective ovarian cancer therapies.

Indexed as

global burden of diseaseovarian cancerPARP inhibitorssegmented regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID41878714
PMCPMC13007953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.