ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Real-World Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Characterization of Venetoclax in Chinese Patients with Hematological Malignancies.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-marketing evaluation of lower-dose regimens is critical for optimizing individualized oncology therapy. Venetoclax (VNX) is approved for the treatment of hematological malignancies at doses of ≥400 mg once daily following a ramp-up schedule. However, favorable clinical responses have been observed in Chinese patients receiving lower doses (≤200 mg/day), prompting further investigation. Methods: A prospective, non-interventional, real-world study was conducted in 76 Chinese patients, yielding 121 plasma samples. Published population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models, primarily developed in Caucasian populations, were applied for external model-based comparisons of VNX exposure between Chinese patients and previously reported Caucasian populations. A new PopPK model was developed for the Chinese population, followed by exposure-response analysis to assess the relationship between VNX dose and therapeutic efficacy. Results: External model evaluation demonstrated higher VNX exposure in Chinese patients compared with Caucasian populations. The newly developed Chinese PopPK model estimated apparent clearance at 7.33 L/h, substantially lower than previously reported values in Caucasian patients (15-19.54 L/h). Exposure-response analysis indicated that VNX at 200 mg/day achieved optimal therapeutic efficacy in combination therapy, with minimal incremental benefit observed at higher doses. Conclusion: Significant ethnic differences in VNX pharmacokinetics were identified. These findings support the clinical effectiveness of lower-dose (200 mg/day) VNX-based regimens in Chinese patients and highlight the importance of population-specific dose optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.