Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878666›Full record

ReviewRadiology advances2026

How to implement a radiologist led whole-body MRI screening program.

Andrea S Kierans, Keith D Hentel, Katerina Dodelzon, George Shih, Martin R Prince, Joshua Lantos, Melissa K Frey, Ravi N Sharaf, Robert J Min, Preethi Guniganti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea S KieransWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9672-1803
Keith D HentelWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.
Katerina DodelzonWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-4385
George ShihWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.
Martin R PrinceWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.
Joshua LantosWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.
Melissa K FreyWeill Cornell Medical College, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York City, NY, USA.
Ravi N SharafWeill Cornell Medical College, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York City, NY, USA.
Robert J MinWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.
Preethi GunigantiWeill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

Implementing Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening across Multiple Healthcare Systems: Identifying Strategies to Facilitate and Maintain Programs in Different Organizational ContextsR01CA211723 · NCI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI RAHM, ALANNA K · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
Gene Dependent Cancer Risk and Optimal Cancer Prevention Strategies in Lynch SyndromeK07CA216326 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SHARAF, RAVI · 2018 to 2021
$675k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA216326NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is gaining increasing attention as a tool for early disease detection, with growing adoption driven largely by consumer demand and direct-to-consumer private platforms. While WB-MRI has demonstrated utility in high-risk populations, its use in asymptomatic individuals remains controversial due to concerns about low diagnostic yield, false positives, overdiagnosis, and the lack of survival outcome data. Despite these limitations, the popularity of WB-MRI is expected to rise given the aging population and aggressive marketing by direct-to-consumer companies, underscoring the need for thoughtful and proactive engagement by radiologists. Radiologists have an obligation to ensure that scientific rigor, ethical oversight, and multidisciplinary collaboration guide the expansion of WB-MRI. This review outlines the current evidence and evolving landscape of screening WB-MRI, describes the development and implementation of a program within an academic radiology practice, and discusses the downstream implications and cost-effectiveness of WB-MRI screening. As this technology continues to expand beyond traditional indications, radiologists must play a leading role in defining best practices and ensuring that implementation remains evidence-based, transparent, and patient-centered.

Indexed as

cancer screeningpreventative imagingscreening whole-body MRI

Identifiers

PMID41878666
PMCPMC13008331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.