Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878662›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026

Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Zixi Lin, Hailiang Zhao, Yilong Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zixi Lin *Department of Blood Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Hailiang Zhao *Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities; Guangxi Medical and Health Key Cultivation Discipline Construction Project; Guangxi Clinical Medical Research Center for Hepatobiliary Disease, Baise, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Yilong HuDepartment of General Surgery of the International Medical Center; The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University; Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-8078-0428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a medical emergency with high mortality, especially when massive transfusion (MT) is required. Traditional scores like Glasgow-Blatchford provide moderate accuracy but overlook complex variable interactions. We developed and validated an explainable machine learning (ML) model for MT prediction in UGIB, improving precision and interpretability. Methods: In this retrospective study, 700 UGIB patients from The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (2021-2025) were divided into training (n=490) and testing (n=210) cohorts. An external validation cohort (n=300) was sourced from The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. From 18 clinical variables, 8 key features were selected using Boruta and LASSO regression. Seven ML algorithms were compared to identify the optimal model, which was then evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided interpretability. Results: The Random Forest (RF) model achieved superior performance with an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI 0.785-0.939) in training, 0.823 (95% CI 0.768-0.879) in testing, and 0.807 (95% CI 0.748-0.866) in external validation. Calibration plots showed strong agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis indicated higher net benefit than "treat all" or "treat none" strategies. SHAP analysis ranked impaired mental status, liver cirrhosis, and international normalized ratio (INR) as top predictors, aligning with clinical intuition. Conclusion: The developed machine learning model demonstrated promising performance in identifying UGIB patients at high risk of massive transfusion. While the model shows potential to assist clinicians in optimizing blood management strategies, further prospective validation is required to confirm its clinical utility in diverse settings.

Indexed as

machine learningmassive transfusionrandom forestSHAPupper gastrointestinal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID41878662
PMCPMC13008123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.