ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Risk of Medical Decision-Making Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients From Multicenter Tertiary Hospitals in China.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Timely reperfusion is critical for improving outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as every delay raises the incidence of complications and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to develop a machine-learning model that quantifies the risk of pre-hospital decision-making delay and visualizes how individual determinants modulate this risk. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 594 AMI patients admitted to hospitals in Hainan from January to August 2023. Data were collected via medical systems and surveys. We used the Elastic Net and Boruta algorithms for feature selection and hyperparameter optimization with grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Six machine learning models were developed: logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, XGBoost, decision tree, and naive Bayes. The primary metric was the Area Under the Curve (AUC), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to assess feature importance. Results: The medical decision-making delay rate was 61.78%, with a median decision time of 3.98 hours. All models showed good predictive performance, with the random forest model excelling, achieving an AUC of 0.91, accuracy of 0.92, recall of 0.98, F1 score of 0.93, and specificity of 0.81. SHAP analysis revealed that pain severity, disease type, and history of myocardial infarction were the most significant predictors of delay. Pain severity had a nonlinear relationship with delay risk, while disease type and prior infarction history showed complex interactions. Conclusion: Machine learning models, especially random forest, accurately predict the risk of delayed medical decision-making in AMI patients and reliably delineate the key drivers of such delay, thereby informing targeted clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.