Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878621›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Risk of Medical Decision-Making Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients From Multicenter Tertiary Hospitals in China.

Yan Liu, Fei Yu, Mingxing He, Lijun Wang, Haiyuan Wu, Wei Liu, Ping Gui, Meizhen He, Hua Zhang, Yuanting Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yan LiuNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-0404-2687
Fei YuNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Mingxing HeInternal Medicine Intensive Care Unit, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Lijun WangNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Haiyuan WuNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wei LiuEmergency Department, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ping GuiNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Meizhen HeNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hua ZhangInternational School of Nursing, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, People's Republic of China.
Yuanting ChenNursing Department, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Timely reperfusion is critical for improving outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as every delay raises the incidence of complications and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to develop a machine-learning model that quantifies the risk of pre-hospital decision-making delay and visualizes how individual determinants modulate this risk. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 594 AMI patients admitted to hospitals in Hainan from January to August 2023. Data were collected via medical systems and surveys. We used the Elastic Net and Boruta algorithms for feature selection and hyperparameter optimization with grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Six machine learning models were developed: logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, XGBoost, decision tree, and naive Bayes. The primary metric was the Area Under the Curve (AUC), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to assess feature importance. Results: The medical decision-making delay rate was 61.78%, with a median decision time of 3.98 hours. All models showed good predictive performance, with the random forest model excelling, achieving an AUC of 0.91, accuracy of 0.92, recall of 0.98, F1 score of 0.93, and specificity of 0.81. SHAP analysis revealed that pain severity, disease type, and history of myocardial infarction were the most significant predictors of delay. Pain severity had a nonlinear relationship with delay risk, while disease type and prior infarction history showed complex interactions. Conclusion: Machine learning models, especially random forest, accurately predict the risk of delayed medical decision-making in AMI patients and reliably delineate the key drivers of such delay, thereby informing targeted clinical interventions.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionAMImachine learningmedical decision-making delaypredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41878621
PMCPMC13006367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.