ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Fluorescent Cholangiogram-Optimal Dose and Timing.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A bile duct injury (BDI) is a serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In the United States the reported incidence is about 0.2%, with approximately 750,000 LCs performed annually. Fluorescent cholangiogram (FC) with indocyanine green (ICG) is a novel technique aimed at reducing the incidence of BDI. Still, there are differences regarding the optimal doze and timing of ICG administration prior to LC. Methods: We performed FC with 3 different doses of ICG (0.05 mg/kg, 1 and 2 mg) injected at 3 different time intervals prior to LC (1, 3, and 6 hours) for a total of 9 different visualizations. Images of the visualized of bile tree anatomy were obtained under white light and near infrared light (NIR) for all cases. A survey questionnaire was prepared and sent out to practitioners via Google Form. Results: A total of 122 people completed the survey. Most of them preferred visualization with 1-mg ICG injected 3 hours preoperatively. Only 16% of practitioners reported routine use of FC, however 87% found the method useful. When asked if they were willing to use the method routinely, specialists were significantly more likely to respond with "No" (χ Conclusion: FC is a useful technique that is still not widely adopted, but has a high level of appreciation for its usefulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.