Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878564›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Simulated risk of root and neurovascular bundle damage during miniscrew insertion in the anterior palate without radiological data.

Antonino Lo Giudice, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Alessandro Polizzi, Orazio Bennici, Giuseppe Palazzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo RonsivalleDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Alessandro PolizziDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Orazio BenniciPrivate Practice, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe PalazzoDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the risk of potential root and nerve damage in planning the insertion of paramedian miniscrews without radiological information. Study design: The study included CBCT and intra-oral scan (IOS) records of 60 subjects (28 males, 32 females) featuring normal transverse palate dimension (Group A = 30 subjects, mean age 20.5 ± 4.7) and skeletal maxillary constriction (Group B = 30 subjects, mean age 21.9 ± 5.1). Two miniscrews (Spider Screws Regular Plus Konic - HDC Srl, Vicenza, Italy), featuring 2 mm in diameter and 9 mm in length were virtually inserted using only the.stl IOS file following established clinical guidelines (T-Zone). Specific linear measurements were registered to calculate the distance between the miniscrews and both incisors' roots and the naso-palatine duct after integrating CBCT images; same measurements were performed after adjusting the position with the aid of CBCT. All data were analyzed for comparison between both procedures and groups. Results: Safe distances were recorded between miniscrews and incisors' roots in both groups ( Conclusion: The present findings would discourage planning or inserting miniscrews in the paramedian region without radiological information (CBCT) in subjects with skeletal maxillary constricted.

Indexed as

digital orthodonticsminiscrewsskeletal anchoragesurgical guideTADs

Identifiers

PMID41878564
PMCPMC13006589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.