ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2026
Spatial memory retrieval under cueing in behavioral frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies indicate that episodic memory is impaired in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), with deficits as severe as those seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Also, both bvFTD and AD patients exhibit executive dysfunction, but the extent to which such dysfunction contributes to memory impairments remains unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate interactions between executive functions and episodic memory in AD and bvFTD by manipulating executive control in a spatial source memory task. Methods: Twenty bvFTD patients, 18 AD patients, and 20 healthy controls completed a source memory test in which they should remember whether objects were previously seen on the left or right side of a computer screen. Critically, arrow cues (66.7% valid, 33.3% invalid) indicated the likely prior location of each object during retrieval. Results: bvFTD and AD patients showed overall similar memory performances but were impaired compared to controls. While cueing affected memory performances of controls and bvFTD patients, AD patients showed undistinguishable performances after valid and invalid cueing. Conclusion: These findings support the notion that episodic memory deficits in bvFTD can be as severe as in AD and demonstrate that, unlike bvFTD patients, patients with AD show difficulties in using information conveyed by cues during memory judgments, probably because of underlying attentional deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.