ArticleCurrent obstetrics and gynecology reports2025
Surgical Approaches to Vaginal Agenesis: The Past, Present and Future.
Article in Current obstetrics and gynecology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: The goal of this work is to review the most common techniques for surgical vaginoplasty. Specifically, this review delves into the history of surgical approaches to vaginal agenesis, including the landmark studies that first described the approaches we still use today. Next, we describe each of the three most commonly used techniques - the McIndoe, the Vecchietti, and the Davydov - including a review of the major case series published on each technique, and supplemented by medical illustrations. Lastly, we outline the most exciting innovations in the treatment of vaginal agenesis. Recent Findings: The field of vaginal reconstruction is experiencing exciting new growth in the realms of increasingly minimally invasive approaches, tissue engineering, and new graft materials or strategies for neovaginal creation. Summary: Throughout history, there have been numerous approaches to the clinical conundrum of vaginal agenesis. There are pros and cons to each of the three most commonly used techniques. Lastly, innovations in the realm of bioengineering are advancing this field and creating exciting new possibilities for the care of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.