ArticleJSAMS plus2024
Acute response to resistance exercise and later development of arm lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: An exploratory follow-up of a randomized cross-over trial.
Article in JSAMS plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In breast cancer survivors at risk for lymphedema, variation in lymphatic function and arm volume has been observed related to a bout of exercise, with potential for prediction of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema (BCRaL). This novel, exploratory study examined the acute lymphatic response to resistance exercise and later development of BCRaL in women at high risk for BCRaL. Methods: One year after participation in a cross-over trial evaluating the acute lymphatic response to upper-extremity resistance exercise (low-and heavy-load), participants were assessed for BCRaL (n = 16). The response to exercise was assessed before and after (post, 24- and 72-hrs) each exercise bout as extracellular fluid (L-Dex; bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS)), interarm volume % difference (IVD; Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)) and symptoms (Numeric rating scale, 0-10 (NRS)). BCRaL at follow-up was defined as presence of one objective indicator (L-Dex >10, change ≥+6.5, IVD >5%) plus one objective or subjective indicator (interarm symptom ≥1 or visual inspection). Descriptive statistics were used to compare the acute response between participants with and without BCRaL at follow-up. Results: No trends indicating a similar acute response to exercise was observed in participants who later developed BCRaL (n = 5). There were no observable differences in acute lymphatic response between participants that developed BCRaL and those who did not, both at an individual and group level. Conclusions: Findings from this exploratory study showed no evidence to suggest that the acute response to resistance exercise can predict BCRaL development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.