Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878494›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026

Prefrontal contributions to the executive control of visuospatial working memory across primate species.

Louise Inger, Maureen A Hagan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Louise IngerDepartment of Physiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Maureen A HaganDepartment of Physiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to gain volitional control over our thoughts and actions to perform goal directed behaviors is largely owed to working memory (WM). WM is a highly distributed process requiring multiple integrated brain regions. The brain regions employed in WM are in part dependent on the sensory input to be remembered. For instance, visual and posterior parietal areas are critical for spatial WM. However, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) appears to be the node at which all of these brain regions converge on in WM, regardless of the sensory input. Understanding how the PFC has evolved to mediate spatial WM across primate species creates a powerful gateway to providing translational insight into human WM processing. This mini-review will discuss three key neuroanatomical regions of the PFC thought to be involved in the executive control of spatial WM - the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), and the frontal eye fields (FEF). In particular, the review will focus on comparison of these regions between humans, macaques, and marmosets to determine the reliability of studying these WM brain regions across species.

Indexed as

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)frontal eye fields (FEF)humansmacaque (Macaca mulatta)marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)primatesspatial working memory (SWM)ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC)

Identifiers

PMID41878494
PMCPMC13006562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.