ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Potential clinical benefits of probiotics in pediatric allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative metagenomic and metabolomic analysis reveals a gut microbiota-metabolite-immune axis in pediatric allergic rhinitis with functional constipation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate potential clinical benefits and superior strains of probiotics for pediatric allergic rhinitis (AR) using meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure up to July 31, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Inclusion criteria were pediatric patients with AR, probiotic interventions, control groups receiving placebo or standard treatment, and reported outcomes such as Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), Total Symptom Score (TSS), serum total IgE levels, or clinical efficacy. Study quality was assessed using the JADAD scale, with meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) performed via RevMan and R software, calculating standardized mean differences (SMD), relative risks (RR), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Results: Eighteen RCTs were included, involving 1,789 patients (963 in the probiotic group and 826 in the control group). Meta-analysis showed that probiotics significantly reduced TNSS (SMD = -0.85, 95%CI [-1.25, -0.44], Conclusions: Probiotic supplementation, especially multi-strain formulations, may provide adjunctive benefits in pediatric AR, with potential for ameliorating nasal symptoms and enhancing quality of life, though further validation through rigorously designed trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.