ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
"We've managed to find our own path of how we do it": exploring parental perceptions of using age-inappropriate formulations at home-a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Parental awareness, attitudes and decision-making of off-label use in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The administration of medicines to children poses distinct challenges, largely due to the limited availability of authorised, commercially available, age-appropriate formulations (AaFs). In the absence of suitable options, parents and carers are often required to manipulate age-inappropriate formulations (AiFs) to facilitate administration. However, little is known about their perceptions and experiences when administering AiFs to children at home. Methods: Qualitative exploratory study. Participants were recruited from a UK paediatric hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted either in participants' homes or at the hospital. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using NVivo v10. Topics explored included formulation types, dosage form manipulation, medicine supply, and administration practices. Results: Over sixty outpatient clinics were screened; 34 families expressed interest, and 13 completed interviews between September 2016 to February 2017 (mean duration: 35 min). Eleven interviews were conducted at home and two in hospital; 12 participants were mothers, and 8 of the 13 children discussed were female. Thematic analysis identified five key themes: (1) inappropriate formulations; (2) unlicensed medicine and off-label prescribing; (3) framework of appropriateness; (4) knowledge, training, communication, and relationships; and (5) patient and family experience. Parents often relied on prescriber instructions without fully understanding the implications of manipulating medicines, indicating a gap in support and knowledge transfer. Discussion: These findings highlight the emotional and practical burdens families face when administering age-inappropriate medicines, including the time and effort required to ensure accurate dosing and safe administration. The study emphasises the need for increased access to child-appropriate formulations of essential medicines and more child-centred prescribing practices. Where legacy medicines remain the only option, healthcare professionals can support children to safely swallow solid oral dosage forms, such as tablets, and educate families on safe medicine manipulation. Further research is needed to better understand the magnitude of these burdens and guide future paediatric formulation development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.