ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Correlation analysis between surgical margin status and recurrence of basal cell carcinoma in high-risk anatomical locations.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common cutaneous malignancy, with tumors located in high-risk anatomical regions presenting significant challenges due to elevated recurrence rates and functional constraints. This retrospective cohort study investigated the relationship between surgical margin status and tumor recurrence in patients with BCC at high-risk sites. We analyzed clinical and pathological data from patients who underwent surgical excision, focusing on margin status classification, margin distance measurements, and recurrence outcomes during follow-up periods. Univariate analyses examined associations between margin status and various clinicopathological features, while multivariate Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared recurrence-free survival between margin-negative and margin-positive groups. Our findings demonstrated that positive surgical margins significantly increased recurrence risk in high-risk anatomical locations. Margin distance showed a dose-response relationship with recurrence probability, with specific threshold values correlating with optimal oncological outcomes. Histological subtypes and tumor size also influenced the relationship between margin status and recurrence. These results emphasize the critical importance of achieving adequate surgical margins during BCC excision at high-risk sites and provide evidence-based guidance for determining appropriate margin distances based on anatomical location and tumor characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.