ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Construction of a predictive early warning model based on machine learning neural network for prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The analysis of prognostic regression of patients in the regional treatment programme for severe trauma can improve the survival rate and quality of life of patients. The aim of this study is to construct an accurate and effective prognostic prediction model for the optimization and development of the regional trauma care network. Methods: We firstly extracted the clinical data of patients admitted to the regional treatment programme for severe trauma in our hospital during the period from January 2020 to December 2022. The criterion weighting method was adopted to comprehensively evaluated the AIS scores of the cumulative patients in different parts of the body. Based on the regression, the patients were divided into cured group, improved group and poor prognosis group. Based on the dependent variables, the included influencing factors were subjected to univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and prediction model construction and comparison study. Genetic algorithm was used to solve the planning model; combined with the results of unifactorial analysis and Xgboost, RF was used to screen the features, and the interpretable model (SHAP) and column charts were used to verify the effectiveness of the screened features. Results: After feature screening and interpretable model validation, 11 indicators such as the main diagnostic score, AIS score and albumin were ultimately included as the important influencing factors of outcome variables, among which albumin was the more important protective factor, and the diagnostic score and AIS score were the more important risk factors. In the comparative study of categorical prediction models, the RF-Transformer-LSTM model achieved the most excellent prediction effect, the accuracy rate of the model test set was 0.9556, the precision rate was 0.9615, the TPR was 0.9474, the TNR was 0.9619, F1 value of 0.9544 as well as AUC value of 0.9271, and in the construction of the three-classification model, the accuracy of the model test set reached 0.9310. Conclusion: We constructed RF-Transformer-LSTM prediction model has high prediction accuracy and good interpretability in practical applications, which can provide strong support for the optimisation of regional trauma treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.