ArticleJSAMS plus2025
Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study.
Article in JSAMS plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cost is a barrier to exercise for young adults with disability aged 18-35 years. Few studies have investigated this barrier in depth. We explored the cost barrier to exercise for young adults with disability in the context of community gyms. Method: A mixed methods study was completed. Data were collected in three consecutive phases. Phase 1 was a survey of entry options reflecting current practice in 59 community gyms. Phase 2 comprised semi-structured interviews with 20 young adults with disability and 25 community gym staff. Phase 3 involved three focus groups with key informants (n = 20 total) from disability, recreation, and policy sectors. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Gyms estimated 10 % of members had a disability. The overarching theme was a mismatch between the wants and needs of young adults with disability with what community gyms and disability systems offer. Three subthemes illustrated this: young adults need flexibility but current practices limit gym entry options; young adults seek value for money, but current practices advocate value-add; and young adults desire community participation, but current practices inadvertently reinforce a rehabilitation model. A further subtheme -financial viability-related to how recreation centres were often not financially sustainable limiting gym entry practices. Conclusion: Despite broadly supportive recreation and policy sectors, current practices and funding systems are misaligned with the wants and needs of young adults with disability, and often incongruent with societal values of social inclusion and community-based physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.