Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878349›Full record

ArticleJSAMS plus2023

Futsal injuries: A 7-season incidence and characteristics.

Keiichi Yoshida, Tomohiko Tateishi, Yusuke Morimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSAMS plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keiichi YoshidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiko TateishiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Douai Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke MorimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Most literatures describe the injury incidence in futsal during the matches, however, the true injury incidence in matches and trainings through the season is unclear. Study design: Descriptive Epidemiology Study. Method: We investigated all injuries suffered by one futsal team in Japan after each match or training session. The number of injuries, player position, circumstances, severity, incidence and burden per 1000 player hours, locations and types of injuries were examined. Results: A total of 518 injuries were reported during the trainings (302, 58.3%) and matches (216, 41.7%). Overall, injury incidence per 1000 player hours was 16.4 and incidence during the match (90.4) was nearly 9 times higher than during training (10.4). Total injury burden per 1000 player hours was 124.7. Injury burden was approximately 10 times higher during matches (725.8) than during training (75.4). Winger had a higher rate of injuries (267, 51.5%) and Goalkeeper had a lower injury rate (50, 9.7%). Contact injuries (278, 53.7%) and non-contact injuries (240, 46.3%) each accounted for nearly half of all injuries. More than a third of the injuries were caused by time-loss injuries (194, 37.5%). The most common injuries sustained during matches and trainings were to the lower limbs (375, 72.4%). During matches, there were more contusions and less overuse than during trainings. Ankle sprain/ligament injuries were the most common diagnoses (59, 11.4%). Conclusions: This study clarified the injury incidence and characteristics that occurred in futsal through trainings and matches. Based on this finding, preventive interventions for specific injury risks may be possible in the future.

Indexed as

Five-a-side footballFutsalInjury burdenInjury incidenceInjury riskSports injury

Identifiers

PMID41878349
PMCPMC13008434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.