ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Performance of Distal and Proximal First Metatarsal Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hallux valgus is a common foot deformity. The combined prevalence is approximately 19%. Prevalence is higher in women and increases with age. The main surgical options are distal or proximal first metatarsal osteotomy. Comparative evidence remains heterogeneous and contradictory. Objective: Evaluating the clinical performance of distal versus proximal first metatarsal osteotomy in patients with hallux valgus. Focus on pain, function, angle correction, and complications. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for publications from 2015 to 2025. Keywords included hallux valgus, distal first metatarsal osteotomy, proximal first metatarsal osteotomy, chevron, scarf, AOFAS, VAS, HVA, IMA, MTP1 angle, union rate, recurrence, complication, comparative study. Only freely accessible full-text comparative studies were included. Data included sample size, techniques, clinical and radiological outcomes. Analysis used a random-effects model. Results: Of the 350 records, 9 studies met the criteria. All techniques improved functional scores and reduced pain. VAS decreased from approximately 7 to 2. AOFAS increased by approximately 25 to 35 points. There were no significant differences between techniques for pain and function. Proximal osteotomy provided greater IMA correction in moderate to severe deformities. Distal osteotomy provided faster recovery. The complication rate was low and similar. Conclusion: Both techniques are effective in improving function and reducing pain. The choice of technique depends on the degree of deformity and clinical goals. Further studies are needed for long- term evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.