ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Cannabis Use and Outcomes in Breast Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rising prevalence of cannabis use introduces unique considerations for surgical patients, yet its impact in breast surgery remains poorly characterized. This narrative review synthesized available evidence investigating outcomes and postoperative complications associated with cannabis use across breast surgery, including breast reduction, mastectomy, implant-based breast surgery, and autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library identified studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing breast surgery with documented cannabis use. Results: Among ten included studies, cannabis use was consistently associated with younger patient age and concomitant nicotine use. Across procedures, cannabis use was variably associated with increased risks of complications. The most salient findings included consistent reports of elevated hematoma risk and wound healing complications, thromboembolic events in autologous tissue breast reconstruction, and infection risk in implant-based breast reconstruction. However, findings were heterogeneous, largely attributable to variability in study design, most notably resulting from nonstandardized definitions of active cannabis use, small sample sizes, and the absence of detailed characterization of cannabis exposure. Conclusions: Cannabis use may increase perioperative risk in implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction, particularly for hematoma, infection, and venous thromboembolism. Cannabis use was not found to significantly impact outcomes in breast reduction and cosmetic breast augmentation. Evidence remains limited by nonstandardized reporting and a lack of prospective studies. Future research incorporating granular, standardized cannabis use assessments is needed to inform risk stratification and perioperative management of this growing patient population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.