Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878307›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2026

Hallucination-Aware Multimodal Benchmark for Gastrointestinal Image Analysis with Large Vision-Language Models.

Bidur Khanal, Sandesh Pokhrel, Sanjay Bhandari, Ramesh Rana, Nikesh Shrestha, Ram B Gurung, Cristian Linte, Angus Watson, Yash R Shrestha, Binod Bhattarai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bidur KhanalRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sandesh PokhrelNepal Applied Mathematics and Informatics Institute for Research (NAAMII), Lalitpur, Nepal.
Sanjay BhandariNepal Applied Mathematics and Informatics Institute for Research (NAAMII), Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ramesh RanaKathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Nikesh ShresthaKathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Ram B GurungKathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Cristian LinteRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Angus WatsonUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Yash R ShresthaUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Binod BhattaraiUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are becoming increasingly popular in the medical domain, bridging the gap between medical images and clinical language. Existing VLMs demonstrate an impressive ability to comprehend medical images and text queries to generate detailed, descriptive diagnostic medical reports. However, hallucination-the tendency to generate descriptions that are inconsistent with the visual content-remains a significant issue in VLMs, with particularly severe implications in the medical field. To facilitate VLM research on gastrointestinal (GI) image analysis and study hallucination, we curate a multimodal image-text GI dataset: Gut-VLM. This dataset is created using a two-stage pipeline: first, descriptive medical reports of Kvasir-v2 images are generated using ChatGPT, which introduces some hallucinated or incorrect texts. In the second stage, medical experts systematically review these reports, and identify and correct potential inaccuracies to ensure high-quality, clinically reliable annotations. Unlike traditional datasets that contain only descriptive texts, our dataset also features tags identifying hallucinated sentences and their corresponding corrections. A common approach to reducing hallucination in VLM is to finetune the model on a small-scale, problem-specific dataset. However, we take a different strategy using our dataset. Instead of finetuning the VLM solely for generating textual reports, we finetune it to detect and correct hallucinations, an approach we call hallucination-aware finetuning. Our results show that this approach is better than simply finetuning for descriptive report generation. Additionally, we conduct an extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art VLMs across several metrics, establishing a benchmark.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal image analysisHallucinationHallucination-aware finetuningMultimodal dataVision-Language Model (VLM)

Identifiers

PMID41878307
PMCPMC13007979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.