Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
The Remote Assessment of Physical Capacities of Patients with COPD, Feasibility and Learning Effect of the 5-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test (5STS).
Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05852821 (The 5 Repetitions Sit-to-stand Test, Carried Out Remotely Via Videoconference, in Patients With COPD), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The 5 Repetitions Sit-to-stand Test, Carried Out Remotely Via Videoconference, in Patients With COPD: Is There a Learning Effect?
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With the rise of telehealth and telemonitoring respiratory chronic diseases, having a simple and reliable remote physical capacity assessment test is an important issue. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a good candidate, but two aspects must be studied before considering its remote implementation, the assessment of a learning effect (LE) which conditions administration and interpretation of the test, and its feasibility via videoconference. Patients and Methods: 40 stable patients with COPD were enrolled. From home, they performed 5STS tests during three visits (V1-V3) of five trials (T1-T5), each with a 5-min rest period. V2 took place 24-48h after V1 and V3 took place one month later. To assess remote feasibility, reasons for non-inclusion related to digital technology use, connection failures, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were recorded. LE was assessed by timing the 5STS tests performed at each visit and corresponds to an improvement in performance over repeated trials. Results: No adverse events were reported. 19% of patients were not enrolled due to a hardware issue or insufficient computer skills. 3% of visits were cancelled due to connection/camera failure. Test acceptability showed an overall satisfaction rate of 96%. Repeatability was excellent with ICC [CI95] of 0.91 [0.85-0.95] at V1; 0.98 [0.96-0.99] at V2; and 0.95 [0.91-0.97] at V3. The smallest detectable change at 95% was 0.99 seconds. Friedman ANOVA of V1 confirmed a LE, with significant differences between the first trial (V1T1) and V1T3, V1T4 and V1T5, and between V1T2 and V1T5 (all p<0.01). The median difference between V1T1 and V1T5 was -1.50 [-2.09/-0.81] seconds. Inter-visit comparison between V1 and V2 showed no difference between V1T5 and any of the trials in V2, confirming a stabilisation of LE after five trials. Conclusion: The remote 5STS is a feasible, safe, and reliable test. Performing five trials is essential to monitor the LE and to avoid underestimating initial physical condition of COPD patients at the start of an exercise training programme. Trial Registration: NCT05852821.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.