Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878297›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026

The Remote Assessment of Physical Capacities of Patients with COPD, Feasibility and Learning Effect of the 5-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test (5STS).

Espérance Moine, Nicolas Oliver, François Alexandre, Virginie Molinier, Florine Barbaste, Maurice Hayot, Nelly Heraud

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05852821 (The 5 Repetitions Sit-to-stand Test, Carried Out Remotely Via Videoconference, in Patients With COPD), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05852821 nacompletednot on this map

The 5 Repetitions Sit-to-stand Test, Carried Out Remotely Via Videoconference, in Patients With COPD: Is There a Learning Effect?

TypeinterventionalSponsorKorianRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Respiratory DiseaseArms5STS remote assessment via videoconference
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Espérance Moine *Scientific and Health Research Department of Clariane, Lodève, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-1323
Nicolas Oliver *Scientific and Health Research Department of Clariane, Lodève, France.
François AlexandreScientific and Health Research Department of Clariane, Lodève, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4453-3004
Virginie MolinierScientific and Health Research Department of Clariane, Lodève, France.
Florine BarbasteClinique du Souffle La Vallonie, Inicea, Lodève, France.
Maurice HayotPhymedexp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nelly HeraudScientific and Health Research Department of Clariane, Lodève, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: With the rise of telehealth and telemonitoring respiratory chronic diseases, having a simple and reliable remote physical capacity assessment test is an important issue. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a good candidate, but two aspects must be studied before considering its remote implementation, the assessment of a learning effect (LE) which conditions administration and interpretation of the test, and its feasibility via videoconference. Patients and Methods: 40 stable patients with COPD were enrolled. From home, they performed 5STS tests during three visits (V1-V3) of five trials (T1-T5), each with a 5-min rest period. V2 took place 24-48h after V1 and V3 took place one month later. To assess remote feasibility, reasons for non-inclusion related to digital technology use, connection failures, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were recorded. LE was assessed by timing the 5STS tests performed at each visit and corresponds to an improvement in performance over repeated trials. Results: No adverse events were reported. 19% of patients were not enrolled due to a hardware issue or insufficient computer skills. 3% of visits were cancelled due to connection/camera failure. Test acceptability showed an overall satisfaction rate of 96%. Repeatability was excellent with ICC [CI95] of 0.91 [0.85-0.95] at V1; 0.98 [0.96-0.99] at V2; and 0.95 [0.91-0.97] at V3. The smallest detectable change at 95% was 0.99 seconds. Friedman ANOVA of V1 confirmed a LE, with significant differences between the first trial (V1T1) and V1T3, V1T4 and V1T5, and between V1T2 and V1T5 (all p<0.01). The median difference between V1T1 and V1T5 was -1.50 [-2.09/-0.81] seconds. Inter-visit comparison between V1 and V2 showed no difference between V1T5 and any of the trials in V2, confirming a stabilisation of LE after five trials. Conclusion: The remote 5STS is a feasible, safe, and reliable test. Performing five trials is essential to monitor the LE and to avoid underestimating initial physical condition of COPD patients at the start of an exercise training programme. Trial Registration: NCT05852821.

Indexed as

Exercise TestExercise ToleranceLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPredictive Value of TestsRemote Patient MonitoringReproducibility of ResultsTime Factors5-repetition Sit-to-stand testCOPDlearning effectremote evaluationvideoconference

Identifiers

PMID41878297
PMCPMC13006348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.