ArticleApplied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference2025
Examining the Efficacy of an Improved CanSim for Quantifying Hemodialysis Cannulation Skills.
Article in Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cannulation of a patient's vascular access is a daily requisite procedure for initiating hemodialysis for those with End-Stage-Kidney Disease. Skills training and assessment for hemodialysis cannulation needs attention; currently, trainees lack effective teaching tools and practice on patients-leading to stress for the cannulator and potentially multiple attempts with pain and infiltration (extravasation of blood into soft tissue) for the patient. We created a cannulation simulator (CanSim) with the goal of measuring cannulation skill and tested the hypothesis that the simulator's process metrics are able to predict cannulation outcomes on the simulator. Data collected on CanSim from a recent study with improved simulation technology were compared with a previous dataset collected on an earlier prototype. Multiple sensors were used to measure different aspects of cannulation behavior and outcome on the simulator. The infiltration rate on the improved system was less than half that of the previous prototype (20% v 53%). Additionally, only one trial included an extra attempt (1.4%) in the new group, with 15% requiring more than one attempt on the older simulator. Analysis of performance metrics revealed key predictors of successful cannulation, specifically shallower insertion angles. These results could inform design of objective, reproducible cannulation training for providers in a safe, simulated environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.