ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Spatiotemporal characterisation of information coding in the multiple demand network.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multiple-demand network (MDN), a set of highly interconnected, domain-general regions active across a wide variety of cognitively demanding tasks, is thought to support cognitive functions by integrating distinct types of information depending on the task. However, the spatiotemporal characteristics with which each node in the MDN encodes information remains unclear. We collected functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data from separate participants performing a complex visual stimulus-response mapping task. We used multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode various task-related types of information-stimulus details, motor responses, and mapping rules-in both the MDN and visual areas. We used model-based MEG-fMRI fusion to compare the high temporal resolution data from MEG with high spatial resolution data from fMRI, extracting commonalities that reflect both the time course and location with which these different task features were represented. Early on, visual regions encoded information about the visual hemifield of the stimulus, while later, the MDN encoded the fine-grained details of the stimuli within the same hemifield and the task rules. We observed distinct temporal profiles of information coding for the cingulo-opercular versus frontoparietal sub-networks of the MDN. This study offers insights into the dynamic information processing of the MDN and provides information-coding-based support for at least two sub-networks within the multiple-demand network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.