Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878252›Full record

ArticleJSAMS plus2025

Support needs assessment tool for people with disability wanting to participate in sport and exercise (SNAT-SE): Usability and acceptability testing.

Jessica Hill, Kelly Clanchy, Stewart Trost, Jennifer Fleming, Emma Beckman, Sean Tweedy, Iain Dutia, Sjaan Gomersall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSAMS plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica HillSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kelly ClanchySchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast Australia.
Stewart TrostSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jennifer FlemingSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Emma BeckmanSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sean TweedySchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Iain DutiaSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sjaan GomersallSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with disability participate in sport and exercise at lower rates than the general population. Health and fitness professionals' lack of knowledge regarding the support needs of people with disability has been identified as a major barrier to participation. To address this barrier, we developed a support needs assessment tool for people with disability wanting to participate in sport and exercise. The present study explored the usability and acceptability of the tool from the perspectives of the end-users. Method: An online survey was used to gather data on the usability and acceptability of the tool from the perspectives of people with disability, health professionals, community-based fitness professionals, and relevant researchers. Results: A total of 52 people completed the survey. Participants reported that the SNAT-SE was a useful and acceptable tool to assess the support needs of people with disability wanting to participate in sport and exercise. Participants also provided recommendations on refinements to further enhance the use of the tool. Refinements included increased clarity of the language used throughout the tool, a reduction in the overall length and flexibility in administration to reduce the time burden, and modifications to ensure all disability populations could equally benefit from the tool. Conclusion: Overall, the tool showed good usability and acceptability. Further research is required to evaluate the tool's effectiveness in improving the confidence and quality of service delivery of health and fitness professionals supporting people with disability to participate in sport and exercise.

Indexed as

Allied healthCoachingHealth promotionMeasurementPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41878252
PMCPMC13008460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.