ArticleJSAMS plus2025
Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) version 16: Updated female athlete codes and Italian and Spanish translations.
Article in JSAMS plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond comfort: why breast support and protection belong in women's sport injury prevention.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Focus on female athletes and special issue on physical activity in people with disability.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) requires regular update to; stay relevant to changes required for optimal code recording; to add additional language translations as they become available and add female-specific codes to reflect contemporary clinical diagnosis and the increase in women's sport participation. Methods: Codes were added to the existing version 15 after the assembly of an ad hoc panel of co-authors. Being a revision that only added codes without changing any structure, informal methodology, primarily conducted by email discussion amongst the author group, was used to resolve issues. Two authors who were native Italian and Spanish speakers, and fluent in English were used to create the respective language translations. Results: The area of greatest deficiency for OSIICS versions 13-15 was in coding for breast conditions. To fit in with the existing consensus categories, the injury format used was CxBxx with a third character B to signify breast within the chest region. For breast illness/medical disorders, the coding format was MxxBx. Conclusion: Although consideration was given to creating a new, standalone category for breast injuries, due to the formalised alignment between OSIICS and Sports Medicine Diagnostic Coding System it was decided such a change requires the IOC consensus panel to re-convene. Additionally, the medical/illness categories need consideration of whether breast disorders best fit in the endocrine or genitourinary system, or if an expanded medical category is needed for female reproductive medical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.