Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878220›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental advances2026

Updating our quantification of non-occupational pesticide exposure in agricultural settings: A revised algorithm for the Agricultural Health Study.

Shuai Xie, Nicole C Deziel, Pabitra R Josse, Jessica M Madrigal, Christine G Parks, Dale P Sandler, Gabriella Andreotti, Mary H Ward, Jonathan N Hofmann, Laura E Beane Freeman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuai XieOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nicole C DezielDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Pabitra R JosseOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jessica M MadrigalOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Christine G ParksEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Dale P SandlerEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Gabriella AndreottiOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mary H WardOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jonathan N HofmannOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Laura E Beane FreemanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Melissa C FriesenOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

STUDIES OF OCCUPATIONAL CANCER--PESTICIDESZ01CP010119 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALAVANJA, MICHAEL · 1996 to 2008
$5.0M
HEALTH EFFECTS OF EXPOSURES IN AGRICULTUREZ01ES049030 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1997 to 2008
$889k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010119Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES049030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding associations between pesticide exposure and chronic disease requires long-term, chemical-specific estimates. To characterize non-occupational pesticide exposure in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), we previously developed a quantitative algorithm that estimated active ingredient-specific exposure to estimate exposure for the take-home, agricultural drift, and residential use pathways, with weights derived from indoor pesticide dust concentrations in agricultural homes from ten studies published through 2015. Here, we describe an update. First, we expanded our meta-analysis to include data from nine additional studies published through 2024. We then calculated relative differences (RD) in pesticide concentrations, with sensitivity analyses for AHS data, for known use of the specific pesticide, and for herbicides vs. insecticides. For take-home, the RD was 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-3.4) between homes with a resident likely vs. not likely to have occupational exposure to pesticides, increasing to 3.7 (95%CI: 1.9-7.4) with known use of the pesticide. For agricultural drift, we observed non-linear trends with distance from treated fields; the RD was 1.9 (95%CI: 1.2-2.8) for homes located <100 vs. >440 yards from field, increasing to 4.2 (95%CI: 1.7-10) with known use of the pesticide. For residential use, we observed trends with increasing probability the pesticide was used, with a RD of 1.6 (95%CI: 1.3-2.0) with ≥20% probability. Our updated findings were used to re-conceptualize the algorithm; we illustrate its application for chlorpyrifos and atrazine. These refinements provide increased confidence in our exposure characterization and will help advance our knowledge of potential health risks related to non-occupational pesticide exposures.

Indexed as

Agricultural driftLiterature reviewMeta-regression analysesNon-occupational pesticide exposureResidential useTake-home

Identifiers

PMID41878220
PMCPMC13007922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.