ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer screening (BCS) by mammography was introduced globally in the last decades of the previous century and has been implemented in opportunistic or population-based models worldwide ever since. In Serbia, the national BCS Program was established in late 2012. Despite its existing framework, the Program's coverage remains suboptimal, and novel approaches to its optimization are being explored. The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in numerous fields has been a hallmark of the previous decade, with AI-based solutions in breast imaging at the forefront of many research initiatives. Qualitative research has been previously conducted from Australia to Sweden, yielding insights into the AI-radiologist interaction, as well as the acceptability of screening-aged women toward AI use in screening. This study aims to gauge the stakeholders' perspectives-radiologists' and women's-on AI use in BCS in Serbia and help inform policy adaptations to maximize the prospective effectiveness of this public health intervention. Methods: Four focus groups (FGs) were organized in total, two with radiologists and two with screening-aged women, in Belgrade and Novi Sad. Residents in training and radiology specialists were divided for maximal discussion liberty. Two research members analyzed the discussion transcripts using a mixed inductive-deductive approach with a flexible coding frame. Results: Radiologists in this study see room for and have an overall cautiously positive attitude toward the application of AI in mammography BCS in the future. If AI were to perceptibly improve the current state of healthcare, such use of AI could be met with support among BCS-aged women. Conclusions: This study represents the first step towards understanding the attitudes of radiologists and screening-aged women in Serbia towards the use of AI in mammography. Additional studies will be necessary to get a more comprehensive overview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.