Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878188›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Case of Solar Maculopathy Secondary to Reflected Sunlight During Garden Tiling.

Nene Okamoto, Toshiyuki Oshitari, Tomohiko Usui

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nene OkamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, JPN.
Toshiyuki OshitariDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, JPN.
Tomohiko UsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present a rare case of solar maculopathy associated with repeated exposure to reflected sunlight without sunglasses during garden tiling. A 64-year-old woman presented with visual field defects during a comprehensive medical checkup and was referred to our hospital three years ago. She noticed mildly blurred vision and photophobia in both eyes. Fundus autofluorescence revealed ring-shaped hyperfluorescent lesions surrounding the fovea, and optical coherence tomography revealed disruption of the ellipsoid zones in the corresponding areas. Electroretinography showed no abnormalities, and the Goldmann visual field test showed mild enlargement of the Mariotte blind spot. She had engaged in gardening without wearing sunglasses for a month during the summer before her symptoms began. The patient was diagnosed with solar maculopathy on the basis of indirect sunlight exposure. As sunlight exposure is essential for diagnosing solar maculopathy, a detailed medical assessment is important for accurate diagnosis. This case may help raise awareness of the potential for solar maculopathy from indirect sunlight exposure during daily outdoor work.

Indexed as

autofluorescenceellipsoid zonegardeningindirect sunlightoptical coherence tomographysolar maculopathy

Identifiers

PMID41878188
PMCPMC13006928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.