ArticleCureus2026
Rupture of Acute Triple-Barreled Aortic Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We experienced a case of rupture of acute triple-barreled aortic dissection (AD), a rare form of dissection characterized by the presence of two distinct false lumens in addition to the true lumen, involving a dissecting aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA). A 71-year-old woman presented with increasing back pain. She had a history of ascending aortic replacement for type-A acute AD, and there was a residual AD from the aortic arch to the bilateral common iliac arteries. An increasing diameter of the DTA had been observed on follow-up CT scans. At the emergency department, her radial pulses were undetectable and the CT scans revealed rupture of the newly developed false lumen of the DTA. Emergency proximal DTA replacement was performed. Intraoperatively, it was confirmed that the cavity of the DTA had a triple-barreled structure. She had wound infection and aspiration pneumonia on postoperative day (POD) 3 and was treated with antibiotics. However, her postoperative course is generally good, and on POD 31, she waits to be discharged to a rehabilitation hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.