SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Scorpionism at the human-environment interface: an eco-epidemiological synthesis and conceptual framework.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Scorpion envenomation is a major but persistently under-recognized public health problem in tropical and subtropical regions. Its occurrence arises from complex interactions among climatic, ecological, socioeconomic, and health-system drivers. Despite sustained high incidence and expanding risk associated with climate and land-use change, these relationships remain insufficiently synthesized. Addressing this gap requires an integrative framework capable of capturing the multi-level determinants shaping scorpionism risk and outcomes. Methods: Drawing on Human Ecology Theory and socio-ecological systems thinking, we developed an integrated conceptual model to organize determinants of scorpion envenomation. The framework synthesizes evidence from environmental science, climate impacts, scorpion biology, venom characteristics, epidemiology, and clinical and public health interventions. More than thirty determinants were categorized into six components: (1) physical-climatic variables, (2) scorpion behavior and ecology, (3) venom composition and toxicity, (4) human exposure and envenomation risk, (5) health impacts and public health response, and (6) socioeconomic factors. The model is structured in two stages: a risk-and-vulnerability stage and a scorpionism-occurrence stage. Results: The resulting conceptual model provides a unified systems-based framework that integrates environmental, ecological, behavioral, socioeconomic, and health-system determinants of scorpion envenomation. It clarifies pathways linking upstream drivers to exposure, clinical outcomes, and public health responses, enabling interpretation of regional heterogeneity in incidence. The framework also identifies priority leverage points for intervention and offers a structured basis for empirical research, risk mapping, and early-warning development. Discussion: This work highlights the importance of adopting a socio-ecological systems perspective to better understand and address scorpionism. By integrating diverse determinants into a coherent analytical framework, the model serves as a hypothesis-generating and interpretive tool rather than a predictive model. The approach supports the development of targeted prevention and control strategies and reinforces the need to recognize scorpionism within the broader agenda of neglected tropical health conditions, particularly given its substantial burden and strong socio-ecological determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.