ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of TAP and M-TAPA Blocks in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Effective postoperative pain management is essential following laparoscopic appendectomy. This exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients and Methods: This prospective, double-blind, single-center exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial included 30 adult patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy due to uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral TAP block (Group T, n = 15) or bilateral M-TAPA block (Group M, n = 15) under ultrasound guidance following induction of general anesthesia. Both groups received standardized multimodal analgesia. Postoperative pain intensity assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour tramadol consumption, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, and adverse events. Pain assessments were performed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively by a blinded assessor. Results: All randomized patients completed the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Resting and dynamic NRS scores did not differ significantly between the TAP and M-TAPA groups at any postoperative time point (all p > 0.05). Median 24-hour tramadol consumption was 50 mg (0-50) in both groups. No statistically significant difference was detected in QoR-15 scores between groups (p = 0.51). No block-related complications or opioid-related adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: In this exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial, M-TAPA did not demonstrate superiority over the TAP block with respect to postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, or quality of recovery following laparoscopic appendectomy. Within a standardized multimodal analgesia regimen, both techniques were associated with low pain scores and minimal opioid requirements. Larger, adequately powered randomized trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.