ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Age-related differences in implicit temporal preparation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthy aging is commonly associated with cognitive changes in several domains. One process that has gained recent attention in the context of cognitive aging is temporal processing of information and preparation for action. The current study aimed to extend recent findings showing that implicit timing ability, or the ability to process temporal information and act when not instructed to attend to time, might be spared in older adulthood. Across two independent studies, younger and older adults completed a simple reaction time task in which a variable foreperiod duration was presented on every trial. I analyzed two aspects of temporal preparation ability, the more controlled "variable" foreperiod effect and the more automatic "sequential" foreperiod effect to see if either of these aspects might be affected by age. In both studies, older adults demonstrated consistent slowing of responses. In terms of indices of temporal ability, however, both younger and older adults showed similar patterns. Older adults showed similar levels of their variable and sequential foreperiod effects compared to younger adults. These findings suggest that implicit timing ability appears relatively unaffected by healthy aging and add to the growing body of literature to better understand foreperiod effects and response timing more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.