ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Feel it to learn it!-Cognitive and motivational effects of haptic learning materials.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Haptic learning materials have been increasingly recognized for their potential to enhance cognitive and motivational aspects of learning. This study examines the effects of using haptic anatomical models compared to visual representations in learning environments. Methods: The research specifically investigates the impact of haptic materials on learning success, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load, considering individual differences in the Need for Touch (NFT). Using an experimental design, 87 university students participated in a study where they engaged with either haptic or visual materials on anatomical structures. Results: Results showed no significant difference in overall learning success between the two conditions. However, haptic materials led to lower extraneous cognitive load and higher germane cognitive load in certain contexts, suggesting improved information processing. Additionally, intrinsic motivation was significantly higher in the haptic condition for specific learning content. Regression analyses revealed that students with a high NFT particularly benefited from haptic models, experiencing reduced extraneous load and increased intrinsic motivation. Discussion: These findings highlight the relevance of haptic materials in optimizing cognitive load and motivation, contributing to embodied learning theories. Future research should explore the long-term effects of haptic learning and its applications across diverse educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.