ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Relationship between ostracism and psychological crisis vulnerability among Chinese college students: the mediating roles of self-uncertainty and subjective social status.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From social exclusion to interpersonal alienation among Chinese college students: the sequential mediating roles of social avoidance and self-disclosure inhibition.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Counselor value guidance and lower psychological crisis vulnerability: dual meaning-and-resilience pathways in cross-sectional and cluster-randomized evidence from Chinese universities.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ostracism is a prevalent interpersonal stressor among college students and has been consistently associated with adverse mental health outcomes. However, limited research has examined the psychological mechanisms through which ostracism increases vulnerability to psychological crisis. Drawing on the need-threat model, uncertainty-identity theory, and social comparison perspectives, the present study aimed to establish a formal multiple mediation model to clarify how ostracism contributes to psychological crisis vulnerability among Chinese college students. Methods: A total of 758 Chinese college students were recruited from four comprehensive universities located in economically diverse regions of China, including developed areas in Eastern China and less developed areas in Western China. Participants represented a wide range of majors, including STEM, humanities and social sciences, and arts-related programs. Self-report measures assessed ostracism, self-uncertainty, subjective social status, and psychological crisis vulnerability. Mediation analyses were conducted to test the independent and sequential mediating roles of self-uncertainty and subjective social status, with gender included as a covariate. Results: The results showed that ostracism was positively associated with psychological crisis vulnerability. Both self-uncertainty and subjective social status independently mediated this association. In addition, a significant chain mediation effect was identified, such that ostracism was associated with higher self-uncertainty, which in turn predicted lower subjective social status and, consequently, greater psychological crisis vulnerability. Discussion: By integrating interpersonal, cognitive, and social-status perspectives into a single multiple mediation framework, this study extends existing research on ostracism and mental health. The findings highlight self-uncertainty and subjective social status as key psychological mechanisms linking ostracism to psychological crisis vulnerability and suggest potential targets for prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing psychological crises among college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.