Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

How do omission and commission errors of trait memory distrust relate to immediate and delayed suggestibility as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale?

Gisli Gudjonsson, Valeria Giostra, Monia Vagni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gisli GudjonssonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Valeria GiostraCentre for Education and Research in Forensic Psychology, The Department of Humanities, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy.
Monia VagniDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences, Humanities and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that immediate and delayed suggestibility, measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2), are more strongly associated with perceived susceptibility to commission errors in memory distrust than omission errors. There were 229 community participants, who had completed the GSS 2, and Memory Distrust Scale (MDS) and the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ). The MDS and the SSMQ measure people's beliefs about their susceptibility to memory errors of commission and omission, respectively. There were several important findings. The main finding in common across the MDS and SSMQ was a significant negative relationship between GSS 2 memory recall and trait memory distrust. This was a robust finding and suggests that both commission and commission memory trust are associated with poorer objective memory recall. In contrast, only the MDS score was significantly correlated with GSS 2 confabulation, Yield 1, Yield 2, 'direct explanation' explanation resistant behavioural responses, and delayed suggestibility at 1 week follow-up. In contrast GSS 2 Shift correlated significantly with the SSMQ score but not the MDS score. The main implications of the findings are that commission errors, as measured by the MDS, are more associated with both immediate and delayed suggestibility than omission errors, and Shift with omission errors.

Indexed as

commission errorsconfabulationdelayed suggestibilityimmediate suggestibilitymemory distrustomission errors

Identifiers

PMID41878025
PMCPMC13006298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.