ReviewHealth affairs scholar2026
Influence of social determinants of health on post-acute use and outcome: a scoping review.
Review in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDoH) account for more than half of the variation in health outcomes. However, their role in post-acute care for neurologic conditions remains poorly understood. Clarifying how SDoH influences post-acute utilization and outcomes is critical for improving equity and informing rehabilitation policy. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of U.S.-based studies published between 2005 and 2025 examining associations between SDoH and length of stay, functional improvement, community discharge, and 30-day readmission in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and skilled nursing facilities among adults with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Results: Among 32 studies, social and community context was the most frequently examined SDoH domain, and functional improvement was the commonly studied outcome. Insurance type, race and ethnicity, and marital status were consistently associated with all outcomes. Medicaid and dual-eligible beneficiaries had shorter hospital stays and smaller functional gains compared with those with commercial insurance. Caregivers support increased community discharge. Lower education and Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity increased readmission risk. Despite consistent associations, SDoH were inconsistently measured. Conclusion: Integrating SDoH into post-acute care assessment may improve equity in discharge planning and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.