Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877999›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

State variations in maternal and child health workforce support.

Paula M Kett, Grace A Guenther, Benjamin S Dunlap, Bianca K Frogner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paula M KettCenter for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4982, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-6493
Grace A GuentherCenter for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4982, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-4978
Benjamin S DunlapCenter for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4982, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2160-8141
Bianca K FrognerCenter for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4982, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5120-1828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal and child health (MCH) indices can identify areas of opportunity to address maternal and infant health needs but tend to lack measures specific to MCH workforce support. Methods: To address this gap, we developed the MCH Worker Supportive Policy Index, a composite index of 28 policy indicators across 4 domains: midwifery workforce, doula workforce, labor policy, and economic policy. We scored each measure on a 100-point scale, where larger values represent more supportive policies. We calculated a state-level average for each subindex and then averaged each subindex's average to produce the overall state-level MCH Worker Index. Results: Scores ranged from 23 (Wyoming) to 92 (California), with high-scoring states offering Medicaid expansion, paid family leave, protections for LGBTQ+ workers, and Medicaid reimbursement for doula services. Higher scores on the Midwifery Workforce Index were correlated with greater certified nurse midwife supply, fewer maternity care deserts, and lower cesarean delivery rates ( Conclusion: These findings underscore how supportive policies, such as scope-of-practice expansion and reimbursement parity, may support greater workforce availability and better perinatal outcomes. These findings highlight both state-level assets and opportunities for improvement and can inform planning and policy efforts targeted towards sustaining a thriving MCH workforce.

Indexed as

doulashealth workforce policymaternal and child health workforcemidwives

Identifiers

PMID41877999
PMCPMC13008011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.