Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877982›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Association of root-knot nematode (

Muharrem Arap Kamberoglu, Mohamed Hussein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muharrem Arap Kamberoglu *Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Cukurova University, Saricam, Adana, Türkiye.
Mohamed Hussein *Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Cukurova University, Saricam, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tomato ( Methods: Greenhouse experiments were conducted across two consecutive cropping cycles using replicated greenhouse plots, with all disease and treatment responses evaluated at the plot level. The first crop experienced near-complete failure due to severe RKN infestation accompanied by ToBRFV symptoms. Before establishing the second crop, DMDS was applied at six rates (10-60 g/m Results: DMDS markedly suppressed nematode populations, achieving 94.14% control at 60 g/m². Across the same gradient, plot-level ToBRFV incidence decreased by up to 86.04%, with no phytotoxic effects observed at any application rate. Statistical analyses revealed a strong positive correlation between root rot severity and ToBRFV incidence (Pearson's r = 0.785, p = 0.0367). Linear modelling showed that root damage explained 61.6% of the variation in ToBRFV incidence (R Discussion: These findings provide the first experimental evidence that ToBRFV incidence co-varies with

Indexed as

Dimethyl disulfideMeloidogyne incognitaroot-knot nematodesoil fumigationsustainable disease managementtomato brown rugose fruit virusvirus–nematode association

Identifiers

PMID41877982
PMCPMC13006598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.