ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Perceptions of Integrated Medical Service Among Stroke Patients in South Korea: Self-Reported Web-Based Survey Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated medical service (IMS) refers to the collaborative treatment of conventional medicine and Korean medicine in Korea. IMS for stroke is recognized for its efficacy, however, there are many barriers to obtaining therapeutic effects in clinical settings. This study was aimed to investigate the current perceptions of IMS among Korean stroke patients to provide a basis for exploring ways to universalize IMS in real-world stroke clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a self-reported web-based survey in December 2021. We recruited 100 Korean patients who had been diagnosed with stroke. The questionnaire developed by the research team was composed of 5 sections: demographic information, stroke history, perceptions of IMS for acute stroke and stroke sequelae, and other perceptions of IMS for stroke treatment. Results: For both acute stroke and stroke sequelae, half of the patients agreed (45% and 52%) and about 15% of the patients disagreed to receive IMS (18% and 12%), had positive expectations of IMS effects (49% and 53%), and feel the economic burdensome of IMS (50% and 52%); National Health Insurance (NHI) covered treatments such as acupuncture and electroacupuncture (69.5% and 69.3%) were the most common types of KM treatment desired; private insurance subscribers had higher preference for NHI uncovered treatments such as NHI uncovered herbal medicines; the most common reason for reluctance to receive IMS was economic burden (38.9% and 58.3%) and treatment not being recommended by a conventional medicine doctor in acute stroke (38.9%) even though most patients had positive expectations of IMS effects (49% and 53%). Conclusion: Stroke patients were favorable to IMS and had high expectations for its effectiveness. Cost and lack of cooperation from conventional medicine doctors were barriers to patients' access to IMS. Policy reform and active cooperation between conventional and traditional doctors may improve IMS access and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.