ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Combined OMP22-PCR and SAT for Brucellosis in Xinjiang, China.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To establish an indirect ELISA method for the detection of human brucellosis based on signal peptide-truncated recombinant Cu/Zn SOD and its preliminary clinical verification.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The standard tube agglutination test (SAT) is a cornerstone for brucellosis diagnosis but has inherent limitations, including false negatives in early and chronic infections and false positives due to cross-reactivity. To overcome these drawbacks, molecular detection targeting the highly conserved Methods: From January 2023 to May 2024, serum samples from 62 culture-confirmed brucellosis patients and 25 controls were analyzed using OMP22-PCR and SAT. Diagnostic performance was compared, discordant results were analyzed, and OMP22 detection was extended to 20 clinical isolates, 20 urine samples, and 2 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. Results: OMP22-PCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 92.0%, which was comparable to SAT (96.8% and 88.0%, respectively; both Conclusion: The combination of OMP22-PCR and SAT effectively compensates for the limitations of each method alone, significantly enhancing diagnostic accuracy. The strong performance of OMP22-PCR in non-blood samples further underscores its value as a complementary tool, thereby supporting the development of more comprehensive diagnostic strategies for brucellosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.