ArticlePeerJ2026
Identification of pathogenic fungi causing ocular infections using full rRNA operon sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although fungal eye infections are a major cause of visual impairment worldwide, standard clinical laboratory methods remain slow, insensitive, and limited in their taxonomic resolution. Sequencing of the full ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operon provides a comprehensive marker for fungal identification. In this study, twenty fungal isolates associated with ocular infections were obtained from Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand, and characterized using four identification approaches. Initial hospital-based routine identification relied on conventional morphological methods and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). To enhance resolution and to develop a comprehensive analytical pipeline, we further employed full rRNA operon sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), analyzed through three bioinformatic pipelines: EPI2ME/Minimap2, NGSpeciesID with BLASTn, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-based phylogenetic analysis coupled with phylogenetic analysis. All isolates yielded complete operon sequences, thus ensuring comprehensive coverage of the target regions. NGSpeciesID produced high-confidence consensus sequences and species-level classifications for nearly all isolates (except one
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.