Observational studyPeerJ2026
Construction and validation of a risk-prediction model for hypovolemic shock after cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.
Observational study in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ovarian cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery are prone to hypovolemic shock in the early postoperative period, resulting in tissue hypoperfusion, lactic acid accumulation, endotoxin displacement, and even multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; however, in existing studies, there is a lack of a dynamic approach to assess the risk of postoperative hypovolemic shock. This study aimed to construct and validate a visual prediction model of hypovolemic shock after cytoreductive surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Patients with ovarian cancer who received cytoreductive surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training group and a validation group. Independent predictors of hypovolemic shock were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression from the training set, and a nomogram was constructed based on these predictors. A nomogram was used to depict the weight of each variable in the logistic regression model on the event occurrence. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 423 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. There were 301 cases in the training group and 122 cases in the validation group. This visual prediction model was constructed based on the duration of the operation (odds ratio (OR) = 1.273; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.052-1.552]), the amount of blood lost during the operation (OR = 1.102; 95% CI [1.020-1.196]), the amount of albumin (OR = 0.935; 95% CI [0.879-0.993]) and fibrinogen (OR = 0.606; 95% CI [0.371-0.948]) immediately after the operation, and the postoperative use of sedative drugs (OR = 2.248; 95% CI [1.109-4.538]). The area under the ROC of the nomogram for the training and validation cohorts was 0.800 (95% CI [0.740-0.860]) and 0.821 (95% CI [0.735-0.907]), respectively. The predicted probabilities of the two groups of models were basically consistent with the actual incidence rates, with the average absolute errors being 0.016 and 0.019, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the training group ( Conclusions: The model constructed in this study demonstrates improved predictive accuracy for the risk of hypovolemic shock after cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer, and it holds the potential to provide a basis for medical staff to achieve early identification and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.