ArticleContinence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Lessons learned from conducting a multi-center lower urinary tract physiology study: the LURN experience.
Article in Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To document the logistics and technical considerations of a multi-center protocol evaluating the sensory and motor function of both the bladder and the urethra, in women with urgency only, urinary urgency with incontinence, and controls. Methods: The study network organization and infrastructure are described, with attention to the technical training methods and continuous data quality control. Results: The LURN Organ study was approved in March 2020 and enrolled participants from March 2021 - November 2023, through the COVID pandemic. One hundred five participants were enrolled from all 6 research sites and completed the study testing protocol with no adverse events. All participants had evaluable data, and the majority of the participants had evaluable data from all 4 lower urinary tract (LUT) tests of the protocol. One test cohort did not reach the target enrollment adequate for statistical analysis. The lessons of a pilot study and technical practice; virtual training for a LUT physiology study; early, continuous technical and data quality control; diverse expertise within the research team, and under-enrollment in one cohort are discussed. Conclusions: The conduct of a large, multi-site extended lower urinary tract physiology study is necessarily complex, resource-intensive, and fraught with possible pitfalls. The lessons learned by the LURN-Organ study group, particularly in the context of unprecedented circumstances, will hopefully help and inspire future investigators to continue this much-needed clinical research in LUT function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.