Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877848›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

The Role of a Pediatric Belt Cane in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment.

Paul Chong, Andrew D Brown, Robert W Enzenauer, Grace Ambrose-Zaken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul ChongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrew D BrownDepartment of Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9728-5924
Robert W EnzenauerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8080-430X
Grace Ambrose-ZakenDepartment of Research, Safe Toddles, Fishkill, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0562-8051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Because children with cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) may have difficulty using visual preview to guide safe navigation, including hazard detection, obstacle negotiation, and foot placement resulting in more cautious gait patterns, we evaluated whether wearing a Pediatric Belt Cane is associated with improved gait speed in children with CVI, with step length and a foot-mobility metric analyzed as exploratory outcomes. Methods: In this pre-post observational pilot, we analyzed smartphone videos from 11 children with clinicial diagnosed CVI at baseline and 8-week follow-up while wearing a Pediatric Belt Cane. Representative walking segments were processed using MediaPipe Pose to track bilateral feet and derive gait speed, step length, and foot-mobility. Outcomes were averaged across left/right per child and compared between baseline and follow-up using paired tests. Results: At follow-up, gait speed was higher than at baseline; step length and foot-mobility showed similar improvements. Child-level mean changes were: gait speed +66.0% (p<0.001), step length +49.8% (p<0.001), and foot-mobility +55.8% (p<0.001). Conclusion: In this pilot pre-post cohort, pediatric belt cane use was associated with improved gait speed, with supportive improvements in step length and foot-mobility. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm generalizability and clinical impact.

Indexed as

assistive technologyblindnessdevelopmental motor outcomeslow visionmobility rehabilitationorientation and mobility

Identifiers

PMID41877848
PMCPMC13007960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.