ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Visual Field Stability After Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Longitudinal Standard Automated Perimetry Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of three diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses: A prospective randomized clinical trial.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) is followed by systematic changes in standard automated perimetry (SAP) global indices and test reliability in a paired pre-post design. Methods: Patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery with PanOptix trifocal IOL implantation and completed SAP before and after surgery under the same institutional protocol were analyzed. Baseline SAP was obtained within 6 months preoperatively, and follow-up SAP was obtained within 12 months postoperatively. Unreliable examinations were excluded, and right and left eyes were analyzed separately. Outcomes included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), foveal threshold, and reliability indices. Pre- and postoperative values were compared using paired tests. Results: Reliability remained comparable to baseline. False-positive rates were 1.7% ± 2.6% preoperatively versus 1.6% ± 1.6% postoperatively in right eyes (p = 0.88) and 1.5% ± 2.1% versus 1.3% ± 1.9% in left eyes (p = 0.73). False-negative rates were 0.9% ± 1.5% versus 1.7% ± 2.1% in right eyes (p = 0.24) and 1.5% ± 2.2% versus 1.9% ± 2.5% in left eyes (p = 0.62). Global indices showed no significant pre-post differences: MD was -1.3 ± 1.2 dB versus -1.2 ± 0.9 dB in right eyes (p = 0.54) and -1.7 ± 1.6 dB versus -1.5 ± 1.6 dB in left eyes (p = 0.65). VFI was 99.0% ± 0.4% versus 98.9% ± 0.9% in right eyes (p = 0.77) and 98.2% ± 0.8% versus 97.8% ± 1.8% in left eyes (p = 0.45). PSD was unchanged (right p = 0.34; left p = 0.08). Foveal threshold decreased slightly in right eyes (35.9 ± 1.3 to 35.0 ± 1.1 dB, p = 0.06). Conclusion: Trifocal IOL implantation was not associated with clinically meaningful deterioration in SAP global indices or reliability measures during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.