ArticleBlood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy2026
Safety and Efficacy of Flumatinib in Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-Life Cohort Observational Study.
Article in Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of flumatinib in both first-line and subsequent-line therapies in 244 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients. Methods: Response criteria were applied according to the European LeukemiaNet. Adverse events (AEs) occurring after flumatinib treatment were documented and graded for severity. Results: The study encompassed 244 patients with CML-CP, stratified by treatment lines: first-line (1L, N=138), second-line (2L, N=63), and third-line or above (≥3L, N=43). First-line flumatinib therapy resulted in a major molecular response achieved by 50.7% at 6 months and 66.7% at 12 months, with a deep molecular response (DMR) achieved by 20.3% at 6 months and 35.5% at 12 months. In subsequent treatment lines, those with baseline MR2 had a DMR rate of 42.9%, compared to 23.3% for those without it. Significant differences in molecular response rates were observed based on treatment line and prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) resistance (p<0.05). However, subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in treatment responses between the warning and resistance groups after flumatinib therapy. Dose reduction strategies, implemented in 19.3% of patients, have proven feasible without compromising efficacy. Eight patients subsequently attempted treatment cessation, with five maintaining treatment-free remission. AEs were predominantly grade 1-2, with diarrhea (27.0%), fatigue (12.3%), and thrombocytopenia (11.5%) being the most frequent. Grade 3/4 AEs were infrequent, highlighting flumatinib's manageable safety profile. Conclusion: Flumatinib displays significant clinical efficacy and a superior safety profile compared to other second-generation TKI, whether administered in first-line or subsequent treatment settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.