ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Ishak stage 6 fibrosis is more likely to regress than stage 5 in CHB patients undergoing entecavir therapy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01965418 (A Clinical Evaluation on Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Program Blocking and Reversing Hepatitis B-related Liver Fibrosis - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Evaluation on Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Program Blocking and Reversing Hepatitis B-related Liver Fibrosis - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From fibrosis regression to recompensation: bibliometric and clinical evidence mapping of disease modification in cirrhosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with milder baseline fibrosis have traditionally been considered more likely to achieve histological improvement after antiviral therapy. However, our previous finding suggests that patients with Ishak stage 6 may have greater potential for fibrosis regression than those with stage 5. This study aimed to evaluate whether CHB patients with Ishak stage 6 are more likely to achieve fibrosis regression than those with stage 5 after entecavir (ETV) monotherapy or ETV in combination with Biejia-Ruangan (ETV + BR) therapy. Methods: Baseline Ishak fibrosis stage served as the main analytic variable, while the use of concomitant traditional Chinese medicine was included as a stratification factor. Demographic characteristics, viral markers, and baseline laboratory parameters were incorporated as covariates. A logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association between baseline Ishak stage and fibrosis regression. Based on this model, a sensitivity analysis was further performed in the subgroup of patients with baseline Ishak stage 5 or 6 to assess the robustness of the findings. A generalized additive model (GAM) was additionally applied to explore potential non-linear stage-related patterns. Results: A total of 705 patients had paired biopsy data. The fibrosis regression rate was 50.21% in stage 6 versus 45.58% in stage 5. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, baseline Ishak stage 6 was associated with a higher likelihood of fibrosis regression compared with stage 5 ( Conclusion: Among CHB patients treated with ETV, those with baseline Ishak stage 6 were more likely to achieve histological fibrosis regression than those with stage 5. Clinical trial registration: Identifier NCT01965418.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.