ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Diagnostic value of computed tomography plus magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the benign and malignant nature of vertebral compression fractures.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the diagnostic efficacy of combining computed tomography (CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining whether vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are benign or malignant. Methods: From January 2020 to January 2025, 150 patients with single vertebral compression fractures who were admitted to our hospital were selected as study participants. According to the pathological findings, they were divided into the benign group (76 cases) and the malignant group (74 cases). All patients underwent MRI and CT examinations. The efficacy of the combined use of these two methods and the combined detection in differentiating the nature of vertebral compression fractures was analyzed. Results: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in MRI signs such as the degree of vertebral body compression, the range of vertebral body lesions, the location of the lesions, the post-compression vertebral body morphology, pedicle morphology, the vertebral body soft tissue, the morphology and signal changes of the vertebral body veins ( Conclusion: The combined use of MRI and CT exhibits relatively high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in differentiating the nature of vertebral compression fractures, and it has a good value in the identification of fracture types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.