Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877771›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

The Immunopathogenesis of uveitis.

Jimin Han, James Harper, David A Copland, Panayiotis Maghsoudlou

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jimin Han *Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.
James Harper *Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.
David A CoplandAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Panayiotis MaghsoudlouAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveitis encompasses a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory disorders and remains a leading cause of preventable visual loss. Its immunopathogenesis reflects the interplay between a uniquely regulated ocular environment and triggers that breach or bypass that privilege. Much of our mechanistic understanding derives from animal models, which have helped define key features of ocular immune regulation. Layered mechanisms normally restrain inflammation: physical barriers (blood-aqueous and blood-retina), a locally immunosuppressive milieu, and systemic tolerance circuits such as anterior chamber-associated immune deviation. When these controls fail, disease emerges through a number of broad pathways. In autoimmune uveitis, genetic susceptibility (HLA class I/II and peptide-trimming enzymes such as ERAP) shapes antigen display and lowers activation thresholds for autoreactive T-cells. Antigen presentation in draining nodes primes Th1/Th17 responses. Within the eye, effector T-cells are restimulated by resident microglia and recruited macrophages, driving cytokine cascades that disrupt the blood-retina barrier and amplify leukocyte recruitment. B cells may augment tissue injury via antigen presentation, cytokine production, local antibody formation, and, in some entities, ectopic lymphoid structures. These mechanisms are largely defined in experimental autoimmune uveitis and form the basis for extrapolating human pathogenesis. Tissue-resident memory T-cells persist into remission and may influence relapse risk. Autoinflammatory uveitis arises from dysregulated innate pathways independent of antigen specificity. Infectious uveitis reflects direct intraocular infection or reactivation. Post-infectious inflammation may be sustained by antigen persistence or molecular mimicry. Paraneoplastic uveitis (autoimmune retinopathy) arises when anti-tumour immunity cross-reacts with retinal antigens. Therapy should mirror the dominant immunopathology. In infectious uveitis, clinicians first reduce pathogen load with targeted antimicrobials and then add anti-inflammatory therapy under antimicrobial cover; maintenance antivirals curb reactivation when indicated. In autoimmune disease, where Th1/Th17-macrophage circuits dominate, steroid-sparing treatment targets TNF and IL-6 pathways. In autoinflammatory forms, excess inflammasome/IL-1 signalling supports IL-1 blockade. Advances in humanised modelling will be key to defining condition-specific mechanisms and supporting the evolution of tailored interventions.

Indexed as

autoimmunityHLA–ERAP axisimmune privilegeinflammasomemolecular mimicryuveitis

Identifiers

PMID41877771
PMCPMC13006656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.