ArticleSexual medicine2026
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor use and sexual dysfunction: a pharmacovigilance analysis.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) remain commonly used owing to their proven antidepressant efficacy, however, they are also associated with a considerable risk of sexual adverse effects. Aim: To examine the relationship between individual SSRIs/SNRIs and distinct sexual dysfunction symptoms. Methods: Using the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we performed a pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse drug events. Disproportionality signals were detected using reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components (ICs), with Bayesian shrinkage transformation applied to mitigate random variability. Outcomes: The primary outcome indicators are RORs and ICs, which were employed to evaluate the association between SSRIs and SNRIs and the development of sexual dysfunction. Results: Comparative analysis of antidepressant-related adverse events in the FAERS database showed that while sexual dysfunction was associated with all studied SSRIs/SNRIs (sertraline, citalopram/escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, and duloxetine), symptom profiles varied markedly. Sertraline presented the most diverse array of sexual dysfunction manifestations, contrasting with duloxetine's relatively restricted adverse effect profile. Clinical Implications: This study provides valuable real-world evidence to assist clinicians in optimizing antidepressant selection, proactively identifying high-risk populations for sexual dysfunction, and improving patient compliance and quality of life during antidepressant treatment. Strengths and Limitations: The use of FAERS offers large-scale real-world data on antidepressant-related sexual dysfunction to enhance generalizability. But the limitation is FAERS' passive surveillance nature, which may involve underreporting or insufficient clinical context, restricting causal inference. Conclusion: While previous studies have not fully elucidated antidepressant-related sexual dysfunction, our findings delineate distinct sexual adverse effect profiles between SSRIs and SNRIs, contributing valuable evidence for personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.